The trial of Chelsea and Matilda’s soccer player is under way, we have seen a number of revelations unearthed in this trial. It is most notably the attitude of Sam Kerr, she has shown herself to be incredibly self-absorbed, entitled and blatantly rude.

When the footage of Sam Kerr in the police station was released during the trial, Sam lost both the trust and respect of many Australians. This is typically referred to as the pub test, Sam failed miserably here, her attitude is nothing short of appalling. Typically people can see the difference between a legitimate defence and pure bullshit, Sam is trying to dress up bullshit as a defence and the vast majority of people see through this flimsy charade.

I feel for the taxi driver, he had a couple of drunk and entitled women in his taxi and was forced to deal . They were loud, rude and obnoxious, when Sam threw up in the taxi, this is when most people become overly apologetic. But not Sam Kerr, her behaviour became even less restrained. Now Sam and her partner Kristie Mewis refused to pay for the cleaning and apparently became more hostile and gave the cab driver an x-rated spray.

Sam’s defense of being a vulnerable minority in a white society is laughable, this faux race defence is just pathetic. The taxi driver is an Asian guy trying to scratch out a living in the United Kingdom. Sam on the other hand is a highly paid soccer player who was clearly behaving in a drunken loutish manner. When Sam threatened to bring in the Chelsea lawyers, these threats were intended to be intimidating, we all know she is an over-paid sports person sponsored by one of the highest paid UK soccer clubs.

Sam attempted to portray a power imbalance between the white police officer and herself, the poor coloured immigrant in the UK. But first, the power imbalance between herself and the taxi driver is easily dismissed, Sam soiled the cab, then her partner damaged the vehicle when the taxi driver who had called the police for assistance was instructed to drive to the closest police station.

Now the Sam Kerr defence was she was being abducted and taken hostage by the taxi driver is unlikely to fool anyone. Sam even referenced the Claremont murders as a defence, not even a nice try and in very poor taste to the families of the murdered women. Sam Kerr is trying every meaningless tactic to wriggle out of her boozy night of poor behaviour, this is what is leaving the vast majority of people dazed. Sam, you acted like a self-entitled teenager when you were drunk, just own it and apologise the next day when you are sober.

The total disregard to the police officer was evident, when Sam Kerr began with the racial slur, if she was not so intoxicated she might have been able to read the room a little better. Even now, clearly Kerr is unable to read the room as the whole context of her defence is compromised. Yes, she was drunk and acted poorly. Plenty of us have done that in the past, the next day, come back, show a little humility and apologise for your behaviour.